Skip to content

Change in voter registration could be a recipe for disaster for our democracy

February 26, 2015

FEBRUARY has been designated as a National Voter Registration month according to the independent Electoral Commission. Although most adults have registered to vote with their local councils, a huge number of our citizens haven’t, including young people who have just turned 18. According to recent figures released by the Commission, there’s been a dramatic rise in the number of youngsters not registered to vote. It’s been estimated that from March to May 2015, the number of 17 to 18 year-olds being placed on the official Electoral Register could be down by 100,000 in contrast to 2014.

In Newcastle, 18,000 people are missing from the register, who are legally entitled to vote in this year’s general and local elections. In the 2010 general election only 44 per cent of young people aged 18 to 24 exercised their right to vote. Unless radical action is taken this figure could be much lower, which would be a recipe for disaster for our liberal democracy. Thousands of people across our region have simply vanished from the Electoral Register as every individual is now responsible to register to vote themselves. What’s wrong with the old system we had where households could register their partners and their teenage sons and daughters. In short these reforms could have a big impact in cities and towns like Newcastle, Durham, Sunderland and Middlesbrough which have high numbers of young people and students.

According to some experts this year’s general election could have a major influence on young people. The outcome could affect education and vocational training at schools, colleges and universities as well as the contentious issue of tuition fees and bursaries, together with the lack of affordable homes and sky high rents. It could have a huge consequence on the number of jobs available in light of soaring youth unemployment, especially up here in the North- East. Newcastle, for instance, has the highest number of NEETS aged 16 to 24. A staggering 18% are neither in work, education or training!

Although electoral registration officers in most local authorities are doing their best to get the missing thousands to register, much more needs to be done to preserve our democratic way of life. The following measures could be adopted to reverse this disturbing trend:

  • A legal duty placed on school sixth forms and further education colleges to give details of youngsters approaching 18 to electoral registration officials;
  • Encourage local politicians from all parties who are genuinely committed to democracy to address groups of Post-16 learners about the value of voting;
  • Encourage universities and colleges to register blocks of students living in halls of residence;
  • Place Citizenship Studies at the heart of post-compulsory education;
  • Pilot election-day registrations.

And finally, let’s broaden the franchise so that 16 to 18-year olds in England and Wales, like their peers who voted in last summer’s referendum to decide whether Scotland should go it alone or not. Evidence suggests that many young people north of the border were not only registered to vote, but did cast their vote in the ballot box to determine Scotland’s future.

Young people should be allowed to have a say in all UK elections which will determine their futures. That’s why local councils , schools, colleges, universities, youth clubs, politicians and campaign groups need to work together to register young people to vote and make sure they don’t lose their voice. To do otherwise would be a betrayal of the next generation.

2 Comments leave one →
  1. February 26, 2015 9:33 am

    Don’t you mean a disaster for the Labour party?

  2. February 26, 2015 4:17 pm

    A ‘household’ doesn’t have a partner or children. A ‘head of household’ may do, or any person in a house hold, but what if other people in the household would prefer to be responsible for themselves? Leaving control over something important like registering to vote in the hands of one person who could potentially exercise influence over others presents problems of its own which you fail to mention here.

    Regarding the figures you quote, how many of those 18000 that are apparently missing in Newcastle are students that are already registered at their home address? In the forthcoming general election many people may well be registered in two places but it is illegal to vote twice in the same election (you can still vote in two local elections though) so the picture is probably not as bad as you make out.

    Additionally how many of the people who have ‘vanished’ have simply moved house and registered somewhere else? How many are old records that haven’t been updated because nobody in a household has updated the information as people come and go?
    Just quoting numbers doesn’t really tell the whole story (unless of course you are only trying to put one side of it.)

    Earlier this month the Cabinet Office put out information about the record number of people signing up on line, over 80k by 4pm on the day in question, so it’s not all doom and gloom. Record signups is a cause for celebration but I assume attributing good news to the Government is too much for a Labour Councillor to do.

    Finally I’ve got another suggestion for encouraging registration to add to your list. How about, in a blog about how low registrations are, including a link to the registration web page where people can register?

    It’s here for anyone interested:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: